The debate over the so-called Marketplace Fairness Act
is not about a level playing field. It is an attempt by politicians to
grab more tax revenue to facilitate bigger government.
It's not unusual, of course, to find that politicians want more of
our money. Heck, that's a dog-bites-man story. What makes this situation
so unusual, however, is that they're trying to reach outside their
borders to grab more money.Here's what you need to know. Some states impose very high sales taxes, and politicians get irked that some consumers avoid the taxes by using the Internet to buy products from out-of-state merchants. But rather than go after in-state consumers, they want to create an elaborate and intrusive system to force out-of-state merchants to act as tax collectors.
Talk about taxation without representation!
Daniel J. Mitchell is a top expert on tax reform and supply-side tax policy at the Cato Institute.
More by Daniel J. MitchellThe Marketplace Fairness Act violates the important sovereignty principle simply because some politicians have spent their states into a fiscal ditch. But this issue involves more than just greedy politicians and attacks on sovereignty. This legislation also has very troubling implications for privacy. It can only work by creating a massive database that matches online purchases with the state and local sales
I don't know about you, but I'm not confident that this type of untested system will be secure. We've already seen major leaks of confidential data from both government and private companies. This database will be a magnet for identity thieves and other hackers looking for
Proponents of this risky tax are right about one thing. Many state and local governments are in fiscal trouble. But these governments got in trouble because politicians are compulsive spenders. And just as you don't cure alcoholics by giving them keys to a liquor store, you don't solve the problem of excessive spending by giving politicians a new tax.
No comments:
Post a Comment