President Obama’s Ticking Greek Time Bomb
Developments in Athens suggest matters are spiraling out of control.
Among the least favorable signs coming out of Athens is the pause in International Monetary Fund-European Union (IMF-EU)
Churchill and the Power of Words
Had Winston Churchill never set
foot in the House of Commons, he would still be remembered today as one
of the major writers of his time.
Had Britain been knocked out of the war in the summer of 1940, could anything have stopped Hitler’s conquest of the rest of Europe, the Middle East, and then the Soviet Union? Could even the United States have then prevented, in Churchill’s words, “a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science”?
Free Speech for Me, But Not for Thee, PC?
Free speech rights ‘for
computers’—in all their glory and with all their limitations—are
fundamentally derived from human activity, warts and all.
That breakthrough film raised the startling specter of sentient machines capable of speaking intelligently and outwitting their masters—at least until their plugs are pulled.
Even in 2012, we’re still quite distant from the world of 2001, but computer speech has emerged as a fascinating new issue at the intersection of law, technology, and politics. As more and more commercial functions and decisions become automated, a discussion has been taking place among legal and policy whizzes about whether and how to regulate and respect machine “speech.”
In a recent New York Times op-ed, Columbia Law School professor Tim Wu provocatively asked: “Do machines speak? If so, do they have a constitutional right to free speech?”
Wu’s questions seemingly answer themselves. Constitutional rights, as everyone knows, apply only to humans, not to animals, cyborgs, or computers—don’t they?
But Wu is getting at something a bit more subtle:
Raining Nonsense during a Drought
The only conclusion to draw from a year like this one is that Mother Nature is not always kind.
William Moseley contributed a sermon for the New York Times, pinning the scarlet A on corn and damning it for all that is wrong with agriculture.
The author informs us that because corn is particularly vulnerable to a hot, dry period during the crucial week of pollination, no sensible farmer should grow it. Gosh, without the agronomic advice of professors of geography, I wouldn’t know what to plant on my farm here in Missouri!
No comments:
Post a Comment